Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While all languages have binding, restrictions on it vary even among closely related languages. Binding has been a major area of research in syntax and semantics since the 1970s and, as the name implies, is a core component of government and binding theory. [1]
Government and binding (GB, GBT) is a theory of syntax and a phrase structure grammar in the tradition of transformational grammar developed principally by Noam Chomsky in the 1980s. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] This theory is a radical revision of his earlier theories [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] and was later revised in The Minimalist Program (1995) [ 7 ] and ...
Principles and parameters as a grammar framework is also known as government and binding theory. That is, the two terms principles and parameters and government and binding refer to the same school in the generative tradition of phrase structure grammars (as opposed to dependency grammars ).
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (LGB) is a book by the linguist Noam Chomsky, published in 1981. It is based on the lectures Chomsky gave at the GLOW conference and workshop held at the Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy, in 1979. In this book, Chomsky presented his government and binding theory of syntax.
Subjacency is a general syntactic locality constraint on movement.It specifies restrictions placed on movement and regards it as a strictly local process. This term was first defined by Noam Chomsky in 1973 and constitutes the main concept of the Government and Binding Theory.
The local domain is the smallest XP containing a DP, in order to satisfy Binding Theory, the DP must c-command the anaphor and have a subject. [1] Therefore, the antecedent must be in the same clause that contains the anaphor if it is to abide to Binding Theory. An anaphor is considered to be free when it is not c-commanded or co-indexed. [5]
The abstract syntactic relation of government in government and binding theory, a phrase structure grammar, is an extension of the traditional notion of case government. [2] Verbs govern their objects, and more generally, heads govern their dependents. A governs B if and only if: [3] A is a governor (a lexical head), A m-commands B, and
The presence of PRO in non-finite clauses lacking overt subjects allows a principled solution for problems relating to binding theory. [1] Within government and binding theory, the existence and distribution of PRO followed from the PRO theorem, which states that PRO may not be governed. [2] More recent analyses have abandoned the PRO theorem. [3]