Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Within a system of classical logic, double negation, that is, the negation of the negation of a proposition , is logically equivalent to . Expressed in symbolic terms, . In intuitionistic logic, a proposition implies its double negation, but not conversely. This marks one important difference between classical and intuitionistic negation.
De Morgan's laws represented with Venn diagrams.In each case, the resultant set is the set of all points in any shade of blue. In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [1] [2] [3] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [4] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference.
Negation normal form is not a canonical form: for example, () and () are equivalent, and are both in negation normal form. In classical logic and many modal logics , every formula can be brought into this form by replacing implications and equivalences by their definitions, using De Morgan's laws to push negation inwards, and eliminating double ...
material conditional (material implication) implies, if P then Q, it is not the case that P and not Q propositional logic, Boolean algebra, Heyting algebra: is false when A is true and B is false but true otherwise.
In fact, a truth-functionally complete system, [l] in the sense that all and only the classical propositional tautologies are theorems, may be derived using only disjunction and negation (as Russell, Whitehead, and Hilbert did), or using only implication and negation (as Frege did), or using only conjunction and negation, or even using only a ...
For example, the formula "a AND NOT b" is satisfiable because one can find the values a = TRUE and b = FALSE, which make (a AND NOT b) = TRUE. In contrast, " a AND NOT a " is unsatisfiable. SAT is the first problem that was proven to be NP-complete —this is the Cook–Levin theorem .
Both A and B conjunct A and B are conjoined Disjunction Either A or B, or both disjunct A and B are disjoined Negation It is not the case that A negatum/negand A is negated Conditional If A, then B antecedent, consequent B is implied by A Biconditional A if, and only if, B equivalents A and B are equivalent
The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-or and that either form can replace the other in logical proofs. In other words, if P {\displaystyle P} is true, then Q {\displaystyle Q} must also be true, while if Q {\displaystyle Q} is not true, then P {\displaystyle P} cannot be true either; additionally, when P {\displaystyle ...