Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
However, they are specifically required to "dress up their hair and beard properly". [1] In December 2003, the Supreme Court of India ruled that Muslims in uniform can grow beards. [2] [3] Non-Muslims and non-Sikhs serving in the Indian Army or the Indian Air Force are not permitted to grow beards. However, Army personnel on active duty are ...
Many countries have different laws and customs for men and women, what may be allowed or perceived often varies by gender. [1] Separate laws are usually in place to regulate obscenity, which includes certain depictions of people in various states of undress, and child pornography, which may include similar photographs of children.
In December 2003, the Supreme Court of India ruled that Muslims in uniform could grow beards, [2] [3] although the rules have since been changed again (via a Supreme Court ruling in 2018) to once again allow only Sikhs to wear beards. [4] Thus, non-Sikhs serving in the Indian Army or Indian Air Force are not permitted to wear beards. However ...
Women from a university in Madhya Pradesh, India, have taken part in a new protest against men who have beards - because of the chafing caused when they kiss. Wearing beard wigs and holding ...
State Trooper Charanjot Tiwana, based in Jamestown, New York, requested permission to grow his beard to the length of one-half inch (1.27 centimeters) in March of 2022 for his wedding.
Women activists highlighted their legal status and according to them, "main problem is that there [are] many laws but women are dominated not by secular laws, not by uniform civil laws, but by religious laws." [31] The legal reversal of introducing the Muslim Women law significantly hampered the nationwide women's movement in the 1980s. [31]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Laws such as the Official Secrets Act and Prevention of Terrorism Act [49] (POTA) have been used to limit press freedom. Under POTA, person could be detained for up to six months before the police were required to bring charges on allegations for terrorism-related offenses. POTA was repealed in 2004, but was replaced by amendments to UAPA. [50]