When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Propositional proof system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_proof_system

    Efficiency: P runs in polynomial time. In general, a proof system for a language L is a polynomial-time function whose range is L. Thus, a propositional proof system is a proof system for TAUT. Sometimes the following alternative definition is considered: a pps is given as a proof-verification algorithm P(A,x) with two inputs.

  3. PCP theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCP_theorem

    The PCP theorem states that NP = PCP[O(log n), O(1)],. where PCP[r(n), q(n)] is the class of problems for which a probabilistically checkable proof of a solution can be given, such that the proof can be checked in polynomial time using r(n) bits of randomness and by reading q(n) bits of the proof, correct proofs are always accepted, and incorrect proofs are rejected with probability at least 1/2.

  4. NP (complexity) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP_(complexity)

    If there is a polynomial-time algorithm for even one of them, then there is a polynomial-time algorithm for all the problems in NP. Because of this, and because dedicated research has failed to find a polynomial algorithm for any NP-complete problem, once a problem has been proven to be NP-complete, this is widely regarded as a sign that a ...

  5. Proof complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_complexity

    A propositional proof system is given as a proof-verification algorithm P(A,x) with two inputs.If P accepts the pair (A,x) we say that x is a P-proof of A.P is required to run in polynomial time, and moreover, it must hold that A has a P-proof if and only if A is a tautology.

  6. NP-completeness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-completeness

    A problem is polynomial-time Turing-reducible to a problem if, given a subroutine that solves in polynomial time, one could write a program that calls this subroutine and solves in polynomial time. This contrasts with many-one reducibility, which has the restriction that the program can only call the subroutine once, and the return value of the ...

  7. Interactive proof system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_proof_system

    In this system, the verifier is a deterministic, polynomial-time machine (a P machine). The protocol is: The prover looks at the input and computes the solution using its unlimited power and returns a polynomial-size proof certificate. The verifier verifies that the certificate is valid in deterministic polynomial time.

  8. IP (complexity) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_(complexity)

    QIP is a version of IP replacing the BPP verifier by a BQP verifier, where BQP is the class of problems solvable by quantum computers in polynomial time. The messages are composed of qubits. [ 6 ] In 2009, Jain, Ji, Upadhyay, and Watrous proved that QIP also equals PSPACE , [ 7 ] implying that this change gives no additional power to the protocol.

  9. P versus NP problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem

    It runs in polynomial time on inputs that are in SUBSET-SUM if and only if P = NP: // Algorithm that accepts the NP-complete language SUBSET-SUM. // // this is a polynomial-time algorithm if and only if P = NP. // // "Polynomial-time" means it returns "yes" in polynomial time when // the answer should be "yes", and runs forever when it is "no".