When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Schmerber v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmerber_v._California

    Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment 's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.

  3. Cousin marriage law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage_law_in_the...

    The legal status of first cousin marriage varies considerably from one U.S. state to another, ranging from being legal in some states to being a criminal offense in others. It is illegal or largely illegal in 32 states and legal or largely legal in 18. However, even in the states where it is legal, the practice is not widespread. (See Incidence.)

  4. United States v. Windsor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Windsor

    United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights case [1] [2] [3] concerning same-sex marriage.The Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  5. Federal Marriage Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Marriage_Amendment

    Constitutional Amendment - Marriage Protection Amendment - Declares that: (1) marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman; and (2) neither the U.S. Constitution nor the constitution of any state shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any other union.

  6. Respect for Marriage Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respect_for_Marriage_Act

    On November 14, 2022, a group of bipartisan senators, including Rob Portman (R-OH), Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), and Susan Collins (R-ME) announced they had reached an amendment compromise to include language for religious protections and clarify that the bill did not legalize polygamous marriage. [57] The ...

  7. Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause

    Sharpe (1954), has been interpreted as imposing some of the same restrictions on the federal government: "Though the Fifth Amendment does not contain an equal protection clause, as does the Fourteenth Amendment which applies only to the States, the concepts of equal protection and due process are not mutually exclusive." [63] In Lawrence v.

  8. Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut

    Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [1] The case involved a Connecticut "Little Comstock Act" that prohibited any person ...

  9. Due Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

    v. t. e. A Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law. [1][2][3] The U.S. Supreme Court interprets these clauses to guarantee a variety of ...

  1. Related searches what does the 4th and 5th amendment say about marriage is legal in california

    federal marriage amendmentsfederal marriage protection amendment
    constitutional amendment of marriagefederal marriage amendment wikipedia