When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Robertson–Seymour theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RobertsonSeymour_theorem

    The RobertsonSeymour theorem states that finite undirected graphs and graph minors form a well-quasi-ordering. The graph minor relationship does not contain any infinite descending chain, because each contraction or deletion reduces the number of edges and vertices of the graph (a non-negative integer). [8]

  3. Graph minor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_minor

    Another result relating the four-color theorem to graph minors is the snark theorem announced by Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas, a strengthening of the four-color theorem conjectured by W. T. Tutte and stating that any bridgeless 3-regular graph that requires four colors in an edge coloring must have the Petersen graph as a minor.

  4. Non-constructive algorithm existence proofs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-constructive_algorithm...

    By RobertsonSeymour theorem, any set of finite graphs contains only a finite number of minor-minimal elements. In particular, the set of "yes" instances has a finite number of minor-minimal elements. Given an input graph G, the following "algorithm" solves the above problem: For every minor-minimal element H: If H is a minor of G then return ...

  5. Graph structure theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_structure_theorem

    A minor of a graph G is any graph H that is isomorphic to a graph that can be obtained from a subgraph of G by contracting some edges. If G does not have a graph H as a minor, then we say that G is H-free. Let H be a fixed graph. Intuitively, if G is a huge H-free graph, then there ought to be a "good reason" for this.

  6. Planar cover - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planar_cover

    Since every minor of a planar graph is itself planar, this gives a planar cover of the minor G. Because the graphs with planar covers are closed under the operation of taking minors, it follows from the RobertsonSeymour theorem that they may be characterized by a finite set of forbidden minors. [7] A graph is a forbidden minor for this ...

  7. Well-quasi-ordering - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-quasi-ordering

    Finite graphs ordered by a notion of embedding called "graph minor" is a well-quasi-order (RobertsonSeymour theorem). Graphs of finite tree-depth ordered by the induced subgraph relation form a well-quasi-order, [3] as do the cographs ordered by induced subgraphs. [4]

  8. Friedman's SSCG function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman's_SSCG_function

    The RobertsonSeymour theorem proves that subcubic graphs (simple or not) are well-founded by homeomorphic embeddability, implying such a sequence cannot be infinite. Then, by applying KÅ‘nig's lemma on the tree of such sequences under extension, for each value of k there is a sequence with maximal length.

  9. Neil Robertson (mathematician) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Robertson_(mathematician)

    This states that families of graphs closed under the graph minor operation may be characterized by a finite set of forbidden minors. As part of this work, Robertson and Seymour also proved the graph structure theorem describing the graphs in these families. [6] Additional major results in Robertson's research include the following: