When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Irreducible fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_fraction

    In the second step, they were divided by 3. The final result, ⁠ 4 / 3 ⁠, is an irreducible fraction because 4 and 3 have no common factors other than 1. The original fraction could have also been reduced in a single step by using the greatest common divisor of 90 and 120, which is 30. As 120 ÷ 30 = 4, and 90 ÷ 30 = 3, one gets

  3. Fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction

    The picture to the right illustrates ⁠ 3 / 4 ⁠ of a cake. Fractions can be used to represent ratios and division. [1] Thus the fraction ⁠ 3 / 4 ⁠ can be used to represent the ratio 3:4 (the ratio of the part to the whole), and the division 3 ÷ 4 (three divided by four).

  4. Pythagorean triple - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_triple

    Animation demonstrating the smallest Pythagorean triple, 3 2 + 4 2 = 5 2. A Pythagorean triple consists of three positive integers a, b, and c, such that a 2 + b 2 = c 2. Such a triple is commonly written (a, b, c), a well-known example is (3, 4, 5). If (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple, then so is (ka, kb, kc) for any positive integer k.

  5. Greatest common divisor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor

    The greatest common divisor is useful for reducing fractions to the lowest terms ... we find the prime factorizations 48 = 2 4 · 3 1 and 180 = 2 2 · 3 2 · 5 1 ...

  6. Least common multiple - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple

    A multiple of a number is the product of that number and an integer. For example, 10 is a multiple of 5 because 5 × 2 = 10, so 10 is divisible by 5 and 2. Because 10 is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both 5 and 2, it is the least common multiple of 5 and 2.

  7. Collatz conjecture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture

    For instance, the first counterexample must be odd because f(2n) = n, smaller than 2n; and it must be 3 mod 4 because f 2 (4n + 1) = 3n + 1, smaller than 4n + 1. For each starting value a which is not a counterexample to the Collatz conjecture, there is a k for which such an inequality holds, so checking the Collatz conjecture for one starting ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Hund's rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hund's_rules

    The multiplicity is also equal to the number of unpaired electrons plus one. [4] Therefore, the term with lowest energy is also the term with maximum and maximum number of unpaired electrons with equal spin angular momentum (either +1/2 or -1/2).