When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Native American gaming - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_gaming

    Native American gaming comprises casinos, bingo halls, slots halls and other gambling operations on Indian reservations or other tribal lands in the United States. Because these areas have tribal sovereignty , states have limited ability to forbid gambling there, as codified by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988.

  3. Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act

    Because Native Americans are technically part of a state, they are required to pay federal and state income taxes. The only exception is when an Indian both works and lives on a reservation. In that case, Indians are exempt from state income taxes. Native Americans are likewise exempt from paying state taxes on gaming revenue. [27]

  4. Impact of Native American gaming - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_Native_American...

    The impact of Native American gaming depends on the tribe and its location. In the 1970s, various tribes took unprecedented action to initiate gaming enterprises. [1] In this revitalization of the Native American economy, they created a series of legal struggles between the federal, state, and tribal governments.

  5. National Indian Gaming Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Indian_Gaming...

    The commission monitors tribal gaming activity, inspects gaming premises, conducts background investigations and audits of Class II gaming operations (and Class III gaming operations, upon request or as provided by applicable law, such as tribal gaming ordinances and tribal-state compacts). The commission also provides technical assistance and ...

  6. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Cabazon_Band...

    As such, the authority to regulate gaming activities on tribal lands was found to fall outside those powers granted by the Public Law 280. Cabazon had lasting implications regarding the sovereignty of Native American tribes in the United States. The ruling established a broader definition of tribal sovereignty and set the precedent that if the ...

  7. Tribal–state compact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal–state_compact

    Tribal–state compacts are legal agreements between U.S. state government and Native American tribes primarily used for gambling, health care, child welfare, or other affairs. They are declared necessary for any Class III gaming on Indian reservations under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA). They were designed to allow tribal and ...

  8. Gambling in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling_in_the_United_States

    Tribal gaming is regulated on the tribal, state, and federal level. Native American tribes are required to use gambling revenue to provide for governmental operations, economic development, and the welfare of their members. Federal regulation of Native American gaming was established under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. Under the ...

  9. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ysleta_del_Sur_Pueblo_v._Texas

    Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether the state of Texas could control and regulate gambling on Texan Native American reservations. In a 5–4 decision issued in June 2022, the Court ruled that the Restoration Act bans only gaming activities also banned by the state of ...