Ad
related to: multiplicative vs additive comparison
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Totally additive is also used in this sense by analogy with totally multiplicative functions. If f is a completely additive function then f (1) = 0. Every completely additive function is additive, but not vice versa.
In mathematics education, there was a debate on the issue of whether the operation of multiplication should be taught as being a form of repeated addition.Participants in the debate brought up multiple perspectives, including axioms of arithmetic, pedagogy, learning and instructional design, history of mathematics, philosophy of mathematics, and computer-based mathematics.
In number theory, a multiplicative function is an arithmetic function f(n) of a positive integer n with the property that f(1) = 1 and = () whenever a and b are coprime.. An arithmetic function f(n) is said to be completely multiplicative (or totally multiplicative) if f(1) = 1 and f(ab) = f(a)f(b) holds for all positive integers a and b, even when they are not coprime.
completely additive if a(mn) = a(m) + a(n) for all natural numbers m and n; completely multiplicative if a(1) = 1 and a(mn) = a(m)a(n) for all natural numbers m and n; Two whole numbers m and n are called coprime if their greatest common divisor is 1, that is, if there is no prime number that divides both of them. Then an arithmetic function a is
The additive persistence of 2718 is 2: first we find that 2 + 7 + 1 + 8 = 18, and then that 1 + 8 = 9. The multiplicative persistence of 39 is 3, because it takes three steps to reduce 39 to a single digit: 39 → 27 → 14 → 4. Also, 39 is the smallest number of multiplicative persistence 3.
The group scheme of n-th roots of unity is by definition the kernel of the n-power map on the multiplicative group GL(1), considered as a group scheme.That is, for any integer n > 1 we can consider the morphism on the multiplicative group that takes n-th powers, and take an appropriate fiber product of schemes, with the morphism e that serves as the identity.
If the additive identity and the multiplicative identity are the same, then the ring is trivial (proved below). In the ring M m × n (R) of m-by-n matrices over a ring R, the additive identity is the zero matrix, [1] denoted O or 0, and is the m-by-n matrix whose entries consist entirely of the identity element 0 in R.
Szemerédi's theorem is a result in arithmetic combinatorics concerning arithmetic progressions in subsets of the integers. In 1936, Erdős and Turán conjectured [2] that every set of integers A with positive natural density contains a k term arithmetic progression for every k.