Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While called bonds, these obligations to protect an employer from employee-dishonesty losses are really insurance policies. These insurance policies protect from losses of company monies, securities , and other property from employees who have a manifest intent to i) cause the company to sustain a loss and ii) obtain an improper financial ...
On October 13, 2017, the NCAA announced it would not levy penalties against North Carolina, saying it "could not conclude that the University of North Carolina violated N.C.A.A. academic rules." [ 64 ] [ 65 ] [ 66 ] In their defense, North Carolina cited cases where Auburn and Michigan had similar misconduct and the NCAA did not act. [ 64 ]
Integrity testing for employment selection became popular during the 1980s. [2] Human Resources personnel found integrity tests were an improvement over polygraph tests. Polygraph tests were no longer able to be used for screening of most future employees in the United States due to the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA). [2]
Since the pandemic, a lot of companies have made a shift to remote work. Many employees have found that working from home offers a lot of benefits, including saving on transportation costs.
Academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic fraud and academic integrity are related concepts that refer to various actions on the part of students that go against the expected norms of a school, university or other learning institution. Definitions of academic misconduct are usually outlined in institutional policies.
Jennifer and Brandon Sheffield were found dead by gunshot wounds in an apparent murder-suicide by police in Mississippi on Dec. 28, according to reports
Kim Kardashian is having a picture-perfect holiday season! On Monday, Dec. 30, the SKIMS founder, 44, shared a selection of sweet images from her festive family time.. Among them were several ...
The landmark case Toshniwal Brothers (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Eswarprasad, E. and Others, decided in 1996, describes the legality of employment bonds in India.It holds that under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, contracts requiring an employee to pay a bond if they prematurely resign their employment are legal and enforceable, at least in cases where employers pay expenses like training for the employee. [2]