Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 (1953), was a United States Supreme Court ruling that held certain provisions of the Revenue Act of 1951 were constitutional, in particular sections related to an occupational tax on persons involved in gambling.
United States v. Kahriger: 345 U.S. 22 (1953) Article I, ... United States v. United States Shoe Corp. 523 U.S. 360 (1998) Veazie Bank v. Fenno: 75 U.S. 533 (1869)
Case name Citation Date decided United States v. Reynolds: 345 U.S. 1: 1953: Alstate Constr. Co. v. Durkin: 345 U.S. 13: 1953: Thomas v. Hempt Bros. 345 U.S. 19
United States v. Kahriger; United States v. Morgan (1953) United States v. Reynolds; W. Wilko v. Swan This page was last edited on 21 April 2020, at 09:00 (UTC). ...
United States v. Kahriger; United States v. Lewis; United States v. Line Material Co. United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. United States v. Rabinowitz; United States v. Reynolds; United States v. Silk; United States v. United Mine Workers of America; United States v. United States Gypsum Co. United States ...
Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., 259 U.S. 20 (1922), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled the 1919 Child Labor Tax Law unconstitutional as an improper attempt by Congress to penalize employers using child labor. The Court indicated that the tax imposed by the statute was actually a penalty in disguise.
South Carolina v. Baker , 485 U.S. 505 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that section 310(b)(1) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) does not violate the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution .
United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United States; United States v. Bisceglia; United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. United States v. Constantine; United States v. Correll; United States v. Davis (1962) United States v. Drescher; United States v. General Dynamics Corp. United States v ...