Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Article 4 is an absolute right, which means it cannot be restricted. There is an absolute prohibition on slavery and servitude, under section (1), with no scope for derogation. Article 15(2) clarifies that there is no derogation from Article 4(1), even "in time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation".
A litigant who has been granted a declaration of incompatibility may receive monetary compensation in accordance with the principles of just satisfaction under Article 41 of the convention, but the award of such compensation is entirely within the discretion of the Government. [5] The Convention itself is set out in Schedules 1-4 of the Act. [6]
CPM United Kingdom Ltd. - the court interpreted the meaning of Article 4 (4)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive. Joined cases C-446/09 and C-495/09 concerned the interpretation of EU legislation governing action by customs authorities against possible infringements of intellectual property rights when suspected goods were within the EU for ...
Article 4 prohibits slavery, servitude and forced labour but exempts labour: done as a normal part of imprisonment, in the form of compulsory military service or work done as an alternative by conscientious objectors, required to be done during a state of emergency, and; considered to be a part of a person's normal "civic obligations".
Article Four may refer to the 4th article of any regulatory document, such as: Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights; Article Four (political party), political party in Sicily, Italy; Article 4 of the Constitution of India, providing for amendments relating to states and union territories; Article Four of the United States ...
In the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy (application no. 27765/09), [1] before the European Court of Human Rights, the Grand Chamber of the Court found in February 2012 that by returning migrants to Libya, without examining their case, the state of Italy exposed the migrants to the risk of ill-treatment and amounted to a collective expulsion.
Handyside v United Kingdom (5493/72) was a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights in 1976. Its conclusion contains the famous phrase that: Freedom of expression ... is applicable not only to 'information' or 'ideas' that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the ...
The basic rights set out in the Charter are as follows: housing, [2] health, [3] education, labour rights, full employment, [4] reduction of working hours [5] equal pay for equal work, [6] parental leave, [7] social security, [8] social and legal protection from poverty and social exclusion, [9] free movement of persons and non-discrimination ...