Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Each possible contiguous sub-array is represented by a point on a colored line. That point's y-coordinate represents the sum of the sample. Its x-coordinate represents the end of the sample, and the leftmost point on that colored line represents the start of the sample. In this case, the array from which samples are taken is [2, 3, -1, -20, 5, 10].
Max-sum MSSP is a special case of MKP in which the value of each item equals its weight. The knapsack problem is a special case of MKP in which m=1. The subset-sum problem is a special case of MKP in which both the value of each item equals its weight, and m=1. The MKP has a Polynomial-time approximation scheme. [6]
Let A be the sum of the negative values and B the sum of the positive values; the number of different possible sums is at most B-A, so the total runtime is in (()). For example, if all input values are positive and bounded by some constant C , then B is at most N C , so the time required is O ( N 2 C ) {\displaystyle O(N^{2}C)} .
Equal-cardinality partition is a variant in which both parts should have an equal number of items, in addition to having an equal sum. This variant is NP-hard too. [5]: SP12 Proof. Given a standard Partition instance with some n numbers, construct an Equal-Cardinality-Partition instance by adding n zeros. Clearly, the new instance has an equal ...
This list of mathematical series contains formulae for finite and infinite sums. It can be used in conjunction with other tools for evaluating sums. Here, is taken to have the value
In additive combinatorics and number theory, a subset A of an abelian group G is said to be sum-free if the sumset A + A is disjoint from A. In other words, A is sum-free if the equation a + b = c {\displaystyle a+b=c} has no solution with a , b , c ∈ A {\displaystyle a,b,c\in A} .
3-satisfiability can be generalized to k-satisfiability (k-SAT, also k-CNF-SAT), when formulas in CNF are considered with each clause containing up to k literals. [ citation needed ] However, since for any k ≥ 3, this problem can neither be easier than 3-SAT nor harder than SAT, and the latter two are NP-complete, so must be k-SAT.
The finite direct sum of modules is a biproduct: If : are the canonical projection mappings and : are the inclusion mappings, then + + equals the identity morphism of A 1 ⊕ ⋯ ⊕ A n, and is the identity morphism of A k in the case l = k, and is the zero map otherwise.