Ad
related to: best practices for code reviews in education
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers".
Coding best practices or programming best practices are a set of informal, sometimes personal, rules (best practices) that many software developers, in computer programming follow to improve software quality. [1]
The Power of 10 Rules were created in 2006 by Gerard J. Holzmann of the NASA/JPL Laboratory for Reliable Software. [1] The rules are intended to eliminate certain C coding practices which make code difficult to review or statically analyze.
The International Council for Computers in Education (ICCE) was founded in 1979, with David Moursund as executive officer and editor-in-chief of the organization's organ The Computing Teacher. [1] In 1989 ICCE changed its name to the present name, International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
Peer reviews are considered an industry best-practice for detecting software defects early and learning about software artifacts. Peer Reviews are composed of software walkthroughs and software inspections and are integral to software product engineering activities. A collection of coordinated knowledge, skills, and behaviors facilitates the ...
Reducing the cost of software maintenance is the most often cited reason for following coding conventions. In the introductory section on code conventions for the Java programming language, Sun Microsystems offers the following reasoning: [2]
This is contributing to the Software Intelligence practice. This process is usually called "linting" since one of the first tools for static code analysis was called Lint. Some static code analysis tools can be used to help with automated code review. They do not compare favorably to manual reviews, however they can be done faster and more ...
Rational Team Concert Code Review: IBM actively developed Proprietary: Rational Team Concert Linux, macOS, Windows pre- and post-commit Review Board: reviewboard.org actively developed MIT: CVS, Subversion, Git (partial), [1] Mercurial, Bazaar, Perforce, ClearCase, Plastic SCM Python: pre- and post-commit Rietveld: Guido van Rossum: actively ...