When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

   There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the Free Software Definition. The Open Source Definition allows for further restrictions like price, type of contribution and origin of the contribution, e.g. the case of the NASA Open Source Agreement, which requires the code to be "original" work.

3. List of free-content licences - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free-content_licences

   This is a list of free-content licences not specifically intended for software. For information on software-related licences, see Comparison of free and open-source software licenses . A variety of free-content licences exist, some of them tailored to a specific purpose.

4. Free-software license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

   [9] [10] The original BSD license is also one of the first free-software licenses, dating to 1988. In 1989, version 1 of the GNU General Public License (GPL) was published. Version 2 of the GPL, released in 1991, went on to become the most widely used free-software license. [11] [12] [13]

5. Category:Free and open-source software licenses - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_and_open...

   Pages in category "Free and open-source software licenses" The following 86 pages are in this category, out of 86 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .

6. Open-source license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

   There are occasional edge cases where only one of the FSF or the OSI accept a license, but the popular free software licenses are open source, including the GPL. [72] Mitchell Baker drafted the Mozilla Public License while on Netscape's legal team. [73] Practical benefits to copyleft licenses have attracted commercial developers.

7. Multi-licensing - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-licensing

   In this scenario, one option is a proprietary software license, which allows the possibility of creating proprietary applications derived from it, while the other license is a copyleft free software/open-source license, thus requiring any derived work to be released under the same license. The copyright holder of the software then typically ...