When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticism of Tesla, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Tesla,_Inc.

    In August 2019, a class action lawsuit was filed in Northern California, claiming that a 2019 over-the-air software update throttled the Model S battery life, some by as much as 40 miles. [263] On December 7, 2020, Tesla settled the suit for $1.5 million. [264]

  3. Applied Mechanics Reviews - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_Mechanics_Reviews

    Applied Mechanics Reviews is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal established in 1948 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. The editor-in-chief is Harry Dankowicz ( University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign ).

  4. Design review based on failure mode - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_review_based_on...

    One objective of a good design review is to examine the results of validation testing, making all product weaknesses visible. This examination involves applying another GD 3 concept, design review based on test results (DRBTR). When applying DRBTR, we must, wherever possible, observe the product test before, during and after completion.

  5. Corrective and preventive action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrective_and_preventive...

    In 2015 there were over 450 issues found with the CAPA systems for medical device companies. To have an FDA-compliant QMS system required the ability to capture, review, approve, control, and retrieve closed-loop processes. [8] A corrective action can also be a field correction, an action taken to correct problems with non-conforming products. [9]

  6. OMICS Publishing Group - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OMICS_Publishing_Group

    OMICS Publishing Group was founded in 2007 by Gedela Srinubabu, [18] who remains the company's director. [19] [20] He founded OMICS because of his difficulty in accessing high-cost journal contents as a PhD student.

  7. After-action review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After-action_review

    An after action review (AAR) is a technique for improving process and execution by analyzing the intended outcome and actual outcome of an action and identifying practices to sustain, and practices to improve or initiate, and then practicing those changes at the next iteration of the action [1] [2] AARs in the formal sense were originally developed by the U.S. Army. [3]

  8. Design review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Review

    The ultimate design review, if successful, therefore triggers the product launch or product release. The conduct of design reviews is compulsory as part of design controls, when developing products in certain regulated contexts such as medical devices. By definition, a review must include persons who are external to the design team.

  9. Action at a distance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance

    In 1873 Maxwell addressed action at a distance explicitly. [13] He reviews Faraday's lines of force, carefully pointing out that Faraday himself did not provide a mechanical model of these lines in terms of a medium. Nevertheless the many properties of these lines of force imply these "lines must not be regarded as mere mathematical abstractions".