Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
has radius of convergence 1, and diverges for z = 1 but converges for all other points on the boundary. The function f(z) of Example 1 is the derivative of g(z). Example 3: The power series = has radius of convergence 1 and converges everywhere on the boundary absolutely.
In mathematics, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is a result in complex analysis named after the French mathematicians Augustin Louis Cauchy and Jacques Hadamard, describing the radius of convergence of a power series. It was published in 1821 by Cauchy, [1] but remained relatively unknown until Hadamard rediscovered it. [2]
Note that sometimes a series like this is called a power series "around p", because the radius of convergence is the radius R of the largest interval or disc centred at p such that the series will converge for all points z strictly in the interior (convergence on the boundary of the interval or disc generally has to be checked separately).
To prove (i) and (v), apply the ratio test and use formula above to show that whenever is not a nonnegative integer, the radius of convergence is exactly 1. Part (ii) follows from formula (), by comparison with the p-series
For instance it is not true that if two power series = and = have the same radius of convergence, then = (+) also has this radius of convergence: if = and = + (), for instance, then both series have the same radius of convergence of 1, but the series = (+) = = has a radius of convergence of 3.
In mathematics, the ratio test is a test (or "criterion") for the convergence of a series =, where each term is a real or complex number and a n is nonzero when n is large. The test was first published by Jean le Rond d'Alembert and is sometimes known as d'Alembert's ratio test or as the Cauchy ratio test.
So the radius of convergence of any probability generating function must be at least 1, by Abel's theorem for power series with non-negative coefficients. Probabilities and expectations [ edit ]
The utility of Abel's theorem is that it allows us to find the limit of a power series as its argument (that is, ) approaches from below, even in cases where the radius of convergence, , of the power series is equal to and we cannot be sure whether the limit should be finite or not.