Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
More formally, proposition B is a corollary of proposition A, if B can be readily deduced from A or is self-evident from its proof. In many cases, a corollary corresponds to a special case of a larger theorem, [4] which makes the theorem easier to use and apply, [5] even though its importance is generally considered to be secondary to that of ...
A porism is a mathematical proposition or corollary. It has been used to refer to a direct consequence of a proof, analogous to how a corollary refers to a direct consequence of a theorem. In modern usage, it is a relationship that holds for an infinite range of values but only if a certain condition is assumed, such as Steiner's porism. [1]
This is a list of notable theorems. Lists of theorems and similar statements include: ... Exterior angle theorem (triangle geometry) Extreme value theorem ; F. F. and ...
Ptolemy's Theorem yields as a corollary a pretty theorem [2] regarding an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle. Given An equilateral triangle inscribed on a circle and a point on the circle. The distance from the point to the most distant vertex of the triangle is the sum of the distances from the point to the two nearer vertices.
The following corollary is also known as Nakayama's lemma, and it is in this form that it most often appears. [ 4 ] Statement 3 : If M {\displaystyle M} is a finitely generated module over R {\displaystyle R} , J ( R ) {\displaystyle J(R)} is the Jacobson radical of R {\displaystyle R} , and J ( R ) M = M {\displaystyle J(R)M=M} , then M = 0 ...
When said of the value of a variable assuming values from the extended natural numbers {}, the meaning is simply "not infinite". When said of a set or a mathematical object whose main component is a set, it means that the cardinality of the set is less than ℵ 0 {\displaystyle \aleph _{0}} .
In Euclidean geometry, Menelaus's theorem, named for Menelaus of Alexandria, is a proposition about triangles in plane geometry. Suppose we have a triangle ABC, and a transversal line that crosses BC, AC, AB at points D, E, F respectively, with D, E, F distinct from A, B, C. A weak version of the theorem states that
In the former case, equivalence of two definitions means that a mathematical object (for example, geometric body) satisfies one definition if and only if it satisfies the other definition. In the latter case, the meaning of equivalence (between two definitions of a structure) is more complicated, since a structure is more abstract than an object.