When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: criteria sample questions template for research article review

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    In 1987, Cynthia Mulrow examined for the first time the methodological quality of a sample of 50 review articles published in four leading medical journals between 1985 and 1986. She found that none met a set of eight explicit scientific criteria, and that the lack of quality assessment of primary studies was a major pitfall in these reviews. [4]

  3. Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting

  4. Research question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_question

    A research question is "a question that a research project sets out to answer". [1] Choosing a research question is an essential element of both quantitative and qualitative research . Investigation will require data collection and analysis, and the methodology for this will vary widely.

  5. Wikipedia : Good article frequently asked questions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

    Article-improvement discussions are intended to prevent near-misses in nominated articles that almost meet the criteria. If the article already meets the criteria when you first review it, then explain exactly what you've checked in each of the main criteria (e.g., "I have verified there is no original research, copyright violations, plagiarism ...

  6. Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of this article about a famous painting

  7. Wikipedia : Reviewing good articles

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good...

    Reviewers may not review articles that they have edited significantly, and they should focus on determining whether the article meets the Good article criteria. The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect", by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the ...

  8. Template:Good article tools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Good_article_tools

    This template is used on approximately 76,000 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage . Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.

  9. Template:Academic-written review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Academic-written...

    Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...