When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fundamental error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_error

    If state courts provide adequate means of challenging federal fundamental errors, then a procedural default may not be appealed to a federal court. However, if state courts do not provide adequate means of challenging the errors, then a federal court has jurisdiction to hear the claim. [1] The Supreme Court held in Coleman v.

  3. Everything which is not forbidden is allowed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_which_is_not...

    (2) The power of the state serves all citizens and can be only applied in cases, under limitations and through uses specified by a law. (3) Every citizen can do anything that is not forbidden by the law, and no one can be forced to do anything that is not required by a law. The same principles are reiterated in the Czech Bill of Rights, Article 2.

  4. List of legal abbreviations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_legal_abbreviations

    Bieber's Dictionary of Legal Abbreviations. 6th ed. Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2009. Bieber's Dictionary of Legal Abbreviations, 5th ed. at Google Books; Trinxet, Salvador. Trinxet Dictionary of Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms Series. A Law Reference Collection, 2011, ISBN 1624680003 and ISBN 978-1-62468-000-7; Trinxet, Salvador.

  5. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    The Federal Rules of Evidence settled on one of these four definitions and then fixed the various exceptions and exemptions in relation to the preferred definition of hearsay. On the other hand, the law of privileges remains a creature of federal common law under the Rules, rather than the subject of judicial interpretation of the text of the rule.

  6. Prior restraint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_restraint

    Not all restrictions on free speech are a breach of the prior restraint doctrine. It is widely accepted that publication of information affecting national security, particularly in wartime [clarify], may be restricted, even when there are laws that protect freedom of expression.

  7. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    The FRCP were rewritten with respect to style, effective December 1, 2007, under the leadership of law professor and editor of Black's Law Dictionary Bryan A. Garner, for the avowed purpose of making them easier to understand. The style amendments were not intended to make substantive changes in the rules.

  8. Title 1 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_1_of_the_United...

    § 1 (Dictionary Act [2]) – Words denoting number, gender, person, etc. § 2 – "County" as including "parish," etc. § 3 – "Vessel" as including all means of water transportation. § 4 – "Vehicle" as including all means of land transportation. § 5 – "Company" or "association" as including successors and assigns.

  9. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    The term was first used explicitly in 1930s legal casebooks as a categorical distinction of selected due process cases, and by 1952 Supreme Court opinions had mentioned it twice. [4] The term "substantive due process" itself is commonly used in two ways: to identify a particular line of case law and to signify a particular political attitude ...

  1. Related searches not acceptable for federal purposes definition dictionary of law cases and codes

    anything that is not prohibitedeverything is not prohibited is allowed
    anything that is not allowedeverything that is not prohibited