When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Restraint of trade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraint_of_trade

    A restraint of trade is simply some kind of agreed provision that is designed to restrain another's trade. For example, in Nordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co., [2] a Swedish arms inventor promised on sale of his business to an American gun maker that he "would not make guns or ammunition anywhere in the world, and would not ...

  3. Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foley_v_Classique_Coaches_Ltd.

    Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd. [1934] 2 KB 1 is an English contract law case decided in 1934 relating to restraint of trade and forward-looking agreements to agree.The initial judgment delivered in the High Court held that there was no "undue" restraint of trade, and this was upheld in the Court of Appeal.

  4. United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

    Every agreement concerning trade, every regulation of trade, restrains. To bind, to restrain, is of their very essence. The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it is such as may suppress or even destroy competition.

  5. Mitchel v Reynolds - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchel_v_Reynolds

    Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PWms 181 is decision in the history of the law of restraint of trade, handed down in 1711 in England.It is generally cited for establishing the principle that reasonable restraints of trade, unlike unreasonable restraints of trade, are permissible and therefore enforceable and not a basis for civil or criminal liability.

  6. Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordenfelt_v_Maxim...

    Following Nordenfelt restraint of trade clauses were prima facie void at common law, but they may be deemed valid if three conditions are met: the terms seek to protect a legitimate interest; the terms are reasonable in scope from the viewpoint of the parties involved; the terms are reasonable in scope from the viewpoint of public policy.

  7. Non-compete clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause

    In contract law, a non-compete clause (often NCC), restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party (usually an employee) agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer).

  8. Illegal agreement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_agreement

    Contracts in restraint of trade if proved to be reasonable can be enforced. When restraint is placed on an ex-employee, the court will consider the geographical limits, what the employee knows and the extent of the duration. Restraint imposed on a vendor of business must be reasonable and is binding if there is a genuine seal of goodwill.

  9. Voluntary export restraint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Export_Restraint

    The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulations on government's influence on trade prohibit export restrictions under normal circumstances; if export restrictions are approved, these restrictions must be non-discriminatory and can only be implemented through tariffs, taxes and fees. However, the government's involvement in voluntary ...