Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes, a Walmart employee, and others alleged gender ...
How to get in on Walmart's $45 million settlement over alleged deceptive pricing practices. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to ...
The Coalition For Change, Inc. (C4C) (Listing of racial discrimination class actions in the Federal government) Wal-Mart will pay $40m to workers - The Boston Globe (December 3, 2009) Mississippi's first class-action lawsuit filed over oil spill - Oil Spill - SunHerald.com (30 April 2010)
The class action lawsuit, first filed in October 2022, alleges that Walmart shoppers across the U.S. and Puerto Rico who purchased certain sold-by-weight meat and seafood as well as select citrus ...
The American multinational retail chain Walmart has received criticism from parties such as labor unions and small town advocates for its policies and business practices. Criticisms include charges of racial and gender discrimination, [1][2][3] foreign product sourcing, anticompetitive practices, treatment of product suppliers, environmental ...
Walmart has agreed to a $45 million class-action lawsuit settlement that may lead to you getting some money. The lawsuit, Kurkorinis vs. Walmart, alleged that people who purchased certain sold-by ...
Walmart shoppers could receive an unexpected windfall of cash as part of a new class-action lawsuit settlement. If you purchased weighted goods or bagged citrus between October 2018 and January ...
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), [1] was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement. [2]