Ad
related to: restatement of torts wikipedia florida
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The volumes covering torts are part of the second Restatements of the Law series. It includes four volumes, with the first two published in 1965, the third in 1977 and the last in 1979. Section 402A of this Restatement , discussing strict liability for defective products , is by far the most widely cited section of any Restatement . [ 2 ]
The Restatements of the Law is one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering nearly every area of common law. While considered secondary authority (compare to primary authority), the authoritativeness of the Restatements of the Law is evidenced by their acceptance by courts throughout the United States.
This page was last edited on 17 November 2007, at 01:06 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0; additional terms may apply.
The attractive nuisance doctrine emerged from case law in England, starting with Lynch v. Nurdin in 1841. In that case, an opinion by Lord Chief Justice Thomas Denman held that the owner of a cart left unattended on the street could be held liable for injuries to a child who climbed onto the cart and fell. [3]
The "foreseen" or "Restatement Standard" approach was established by the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Second Restatement of Law of Torts. With this approach the auditor is liable to all third parties in which their reliance is foreseen even if the auditor doesn't know the third party. [13]
The Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 328D describes a two-step process for establishing res ipsa loquitur. The first step is whether the accident is the kind usually caused by negligence, and the second is whether or not the defendant had exclusive control over the instrumentality that caused the accident.
William Lloyd Prosser (March 15, 1898 – 1972 [1]) was the Dean of the School of Law at UC Berkeley from 1948 to 1961. Prosser authored several editions of Prosser on Torts, universally recognized as the leading work on the subject of tort law for a generation.
Restatement of the Law of Torts, § 262). A force or instrument of harm having been launched with potentialities of danger manifest to the eye of prudence, the one who launches it is under a duty to keep it within bounds (Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co., supra, at p. 168).