When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Faulty generalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization

    Hasty generalization is the fallacy of examining just one or very few examples or studying a single case and generalizing that to be representative of the whole class of objects or phenomena. The opposite, slothful induction , is the fallacy of denying the logical conclusion of an inductive argument, dismissing an effect as "just a coincidence ...

  3. Argument from anecdote - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_anecdote

    The fallacy can take many forms, such as cherry picking, hasty generalization, proof by assertion, and so on. [ 1 ] The fallacy does not mean that every single instance of sense data or testimony must be considered a fallacy, only that anecdotal evidence, when improperly used in logic, results in a fallacy.

  4. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Hasty generalization (fallacy of insufficient statistics, fallacy of insufficient sample, fallacy of the lonely fact, hasty induction, secundum quid, converse accident, jumping to conclusions) – basing a broad conclusion on a small or unrepresentative sample. [55]

  5. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Hasty generalization often follows a pattern such as: X is true for A. X is true for B. Therefore, X is true for C, D, etc. While never a valid logical deduction, if such an inference can be made on statistical grounds, it may nonetheless be convincing. This is because with enough empirical evidence, the generalization is no longer a hasty one.

  6. Wikipedia : Rational debate

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rational_debate

    2. Thou shall not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. ("Straw Man Fallacy) 3. Thou shall not use small numbers to represent the whole. ("Hasty Generalization") 4. Thou shall not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. ("Begging the Question") 5.

  7. ‘Perhaps you were a little hasty.’ After Biden-Trump debate ...

    www.aol.com/news/perhaps-were-little-hasty-biden...

    As the great Tom Waits once sang, in a tune that is all taunt, “Perhaps you were a little — hasty, hehehe.” Perhaps a lot of us were. Perhaps a lot of us were.

  8. Informal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

    In the case of the fallacy of sweeping generalization, a general rule is applied incorrectly to an exceptional case. For example, "[e]veryone has a right to his or her property. Therefore, even though Jones had been declared insane, you had no right to take his weapon away." [16]: 147 The generalization, in this case, ignores that insanity is ...

  9. ‘Perhaps you were a little hasty.’ After Biden-Trump debate ...

    www.aol.com/perhaps-were-little-hasty-biden...

    Politics. Science & Tech. Sports. Weather. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. ... “Perhaps you were a little — hasty, hehehe.” Perhaps a lot of ...