Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Referring to a Canadian Supreme Court decision, he said: “The court found that Quebec did not meet the threshold of a colonial people or an oppressed people, nor could it be suggested that ...
The Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800 ...
On 23 November, the Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament did not have the power to legislate a second independence referendum. Following the Supreme Court decision, the SNP stated that it wanted to amend the Scotland Act 1998 in order to enable the holding of a referendum in 2023. [19] [104]
Sir James Eadie, for the UK Government, warned against ‘dragging the court into the political process’. Question over indyref2 should not be ‘farmed out’ to Supreme Court, judges told Skip ...
The case was heard in a virtual hearing of the Court of Session on Tuesday. Decision on indyref2 consent issue needed before election, court hears Skip to main content
The former deputy president of the Supreme Court said the judges understood the case’s importance. Supreme Court indyref2 judgment could take ‘six to eight weeks’, Lord Hope says Skip to ...
The Advocate General for Scotland, Lord Stewart QC, has said the decision does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. UK Government: Supreme Court does not have power to rule on ...
The New Jersey legislature had prepared a bill legalizing sports gambling prior to the Supreme Court ruling, and upon the Court's decision, formally introduced the bill the same day; the bill had undergone several revisions, and had passed both houses and signed into law by Governor Murphy by June 11, 2018. [44] [45]