When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: exculpatory evidence vs indictment california state code

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Exculpatory evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exculpatory_evidence

    In some countries such as Germany, the prosecutor has to actively search for both exculpatory and inculpatory circumstances and evidence before filing of action. [3] Per the Brady v. Maryland decision, prosecutors in the United States have a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence even if not requested to do so. While the prosecution is not ...

  3. United States v. Williams (1992) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning the presentation of exculpatory evidence to a grand jury.It ruled that the federal courts do not have the supervisory power to require prosecutors to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.

  4. Giglio v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giglio_v._United_States

    Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]

  5. California Evidence Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Evidence_Code

    The California Evidence Code (abbreviated to Evid. Code in the California Style Manual) is a California code that was enacted by the California State Legislature on May 18, 1965 [1] to codify the formerly mostly common-law law of evidence. Section 351 of the Code effectively abolished any remnants of the law of evidence not explicitly included ...

  6. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    In some instances however, the statute may be overridden by an accused's constitutional right to disclosure of exculpatory evidence. [9] [10] The Jencks Act governs production of statements and reports of prosecution witnesses during federal criminal trials.

  7. Kyles v. Whitley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyles_v._Whitley

    The Court held that Kyles should be granted a new trial. The Court noted Brady v.Maryland (1963), which held that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.

  8. California Restricts Use Of Rap Lyrics As Evidence In Court - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/california-restricts-rap-lyrics...

    California prosecutors will no longer be able to use musical artists' lyrics in criminal trials against them unless they meet specific parameters. It's a change with huge implications for racial ...

  9. The U.S. Bill of Rights. Article Three, Section Two, Clause Three of the United States Constitution provides that: . Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have ...