Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
They also state that because of the increase of female labor participation, most Irish women suffer from "dual burden", which is because family policies have lagged, leaving no support for child care services. [3] Even though family policies are a bigger concern in Ireland compared to other liberal democracies, the Irish female labor ...
Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a Supreme Court case involving the burden of proof for the revocation of parental rights.The case arose when the Ulster County, New York, Department of Social Services sought to revoke John Santosky II and Annie Santosky's parental rights to their three children.
Efforts have been made to document the effects of this double burden on couples placed in such situations. [3] Many studies have traced the effects of the gendered division of labor, and in most cases there was a notable difference between the time men and women contribute to unpaid labor.
Furthermore, the structure of political parties, the high cost of running for office, and the dual burden of work and family responsibilities continue to pose barriers. Despite widespread ratification of CEDAW, women remain underrepresented at all levels of government, reflecting ongoing gender disparities in political participation. [2]
The relegation of women and minorities to traditionally low-paying jobs has made it so that Chicanas do not have many options for work outside of agriculture or domesticity, areas characterized by low wages and, therefore, low status. Discrimination based on race and gender and a reluctance to acculturate inhibit occupational mobility.
The breadwinner model is a paradigm of family centered on a breadwinner, "the member of a family who earns the money to support the others." [1] Traditionally, the earner works outside the home to provide the family with income and benefits such as health insurance, while the non-earner stays at home and takes care of children and the elderly.
In the end, a compromise was made where immigration based on familial reunification is more critical than immigration based on labor and skilled workers. [7] Later, Senator Philip Hart (D-MI) introduced the Immigration and Nationality bill, S.500, to the Senate.
Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, [1] which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) [2] constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due ...