When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: illinois state warrant search free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ybarra v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ybarra_v._Illinois

    Case history; Prior: 58 Ill. App. 3d 57, 373 N. E. 2d 1013: Holding; When a search warrant specifies the person or people named in the warrant to be searched and the things to be seized, there is no authority to search others not named in the warrant, unless the warrant specifically mentions that the unnamed parties are involved in criminal activity or exigent circumstances are clearly shown.

  3. List of law enforcement officers convicted for an on-duty ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_enforcement...

    This is a list of law enforcement officers convicted for an on-duty killing in the United States.The listing documents the date the incident resulting in conviction occurred, the date the officer(s) was convicted, the name of the officer(s), and a brief description of the original occurrence making no implications regarding wrongdoing or justification on the part of the person killed or ...

  4. National Crime Information Center - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Crime_Information...

    Wanted Person File: Records on criminals (including juveniles who may have been tried as adults) for whom a federal warrant or a felony or misdemeanor warrant is outstanding. National Sex Offender Registry File: Records on people who are required to register in a jurisdiction's sex offender registry.

  5. Illinois v. Gates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Gates

    In Illinois v. Gates, probable cause was achieved for the warrant under the new "totality-of-the-circumstances" standard because the investigation by DEA and Detective Mader would have, on its own, been probable cause for a search warrant. [citation needed] The Gates' actions were suspicious because Florida is a known source of illegal drugs ...

  6. Illinois v. Caballes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Caballes

    Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.

  7. Illinois wiretapping law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_wiretapping_law

    Illinois's wiretapping law (720 Illinois Compiled Statutes 5 / Criminal Code of 2012. Article 14 , also called the Illinois eavesdropping law ) was a "two-party consent" law. Illinois made it a crime to use an " eavesdropping device" to overhear or record a phone call or conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation.