Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
found a better template: 12:04, 23 September 2007: 465 × 225 (18 KB) Marmelad {{Information |Description=Size comparison between the famous ceratopsian Triceratops and a human |Source=Based on Image:Human-triceratops size comparison.png |Date=2007-09-23 |Author=Marmelad |Permission=Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment; current: 22:45, 23 September 2007: 930 × 574 (21 KB): Marmelad {{Information |Description=Size comparison between the herrerasaur Staurikosaurus and a human |Source=Based on Image:Human-staurikosaurus size comparison2.png |Date=2007-09-23 |Author=Marmelad |Permission=Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Thus, a horse that measures 60 inches is 15 hands high (15 × 4 = 60) and a horse halfway between 15 and 16 hands is 15.2 hands, or 62 inches tall (15 × 4 + 2 = 62) [5] [7] Because the subdivision of a hand is a base 4 system, a horse 64 inches high is 16.0 hands high, not 15.4. [2]
Recent research indicates that, in non-human primates, whole brain size is a better measure of cognitive abilities than brain-to-body mass ratio. The total weight of the species is greater than the predicted sample only if the frontal lobe is adjusted for spatial relation. [ 19 ]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
A comparison of Mongol horses, Japanese horses, and Arab Anglo/Thoroughbred horses found that Mongol horses had the highest genetic diversity, with a heterozygosity ranging from 0.75 to 0.77. [3] Compared to low heterozygosity values for Thoroughbreds (0.461), Arabians (0.478) and the bottlenecked Przewalski's horse (0.474), the genetic ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us