Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
xUnit.net is a free and open-source unit testing tool for the .NET Framework, written by the original author of NUnit. The software can also be used with .NET Core and [2] Mono. It is licensed under Apache License 2.0, and the source code is available on GitHub. [3] xUnit.net works with Xamarin, ReSharper, CodeRush, and TestDriven.NET. [4]
The term "xUnit" refers to any such adaptation where "x" is a placeholder for the language-specific prefix. The xUnit frameworks are often used for unit testing – testing an isolated unit of code – but can be used for any level of software testing including integration and system.
The Java source code (or "src") can be found under the src/main/java directory, and the test files can be found under the src/test/java directory. [11] Maven can be used for any Java Project. [ 10 ] It uses the Project Object Model (POM), which is an XML-based approach to configuring the build steps for the project. [ 10 ]
Tests can be run from a console runner, within Visual Studio through a Test Adapter, [1] or through 3rd party runners. Tests can be run in parallel. [2] Strong support for data driven tests. [3] Supports multiple platforms including .NET Core, [4] Xamarin Mobile, [5] Compact Framework [6] and Silverlight. [7]
A JUnit test runner that runs JavaScript tests. The goal of the JS Test Runner is to be able to test JavaScript code using an approach that test driven programmers will feel comfortable with; particularly in the context of Continuous Integration. Sinon.js: Compatible: Yes: Yes [237] Standalone test spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript.
Unit is defined as a single behaviour exhibited by the system under test (SUT), usually corresponding to a requirement [definition needed].While it may imply that it is a function or a module (in procedural programming) or a method or a class (in object-oriented programming) it does not mean functions/methods, modules or classes always correspond to units.
Test-driven development (TDD) is a way of writing code that involves writing an automated unit-level test case that fails, then writing just enough code to make the test pass, then refactoring both the test code and the production code, then repeating with another new test case.
In contrast to the happy path, process steps for alternate flow and exception flow may also be documented. [3] Happy path test is a well-defined test case using known input, which executes without exception and produces an expected output. [4]