When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tautology (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(rule_of_inference)

    In propositional logic, tautology is either of two commonly used rules of replacement. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The rules are used to eliminate redundancy in disjunctions and conjunctions when they occur in logical proofs .

  3. List of rules of inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rules_of_inference

    With this premise, we also conclude that q=T, p∨q=T, etc. as shown by columns 9–15. The column-11 operator (IF/THEN), shows Modus ponens rule: when p→q=T and p=T only one line of the truth table (the first) satisfies these two conditions. On this line, q is also true. Therefore, whenever p q is true and p is true, q must also be true.

  4. Logical equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalence

    Formulas and are logically equivalent if and only if the statement of their material equivalence is a tautology. [ 2 ] The material equivalence of p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} (often written as pq {\displaystyle p\leftrightarrow q} ) is itself another statement in the same object language as p {\displaystyle p} and q ...

  5. Tautology (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(logic)

    Many logicians in the early 20th century used the term 'tautology' for any formula that is universally valid, whether a formula of propositional logic or of predicate logic. In this broad sense, a tautology is a formula that is true under all interpretations, or that is logically equivalent to the negation of a contradiction.

  6. Tautological consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautological_consequence

    Tautological consequence can also be defined as ... is a substitution instance of a tautology, with the same effect. [2]It follows from the definition that if a proposition p is a contradiction then p tautologically implies every proposition, because there is no truth valuation that causes p to be true and so the definition of tautological implication is trivially satisfied.

  7. Logical connective - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_connective

    Of its five connectives, {, , , ¬, ⊥}, only negation "¬" can be reduced to other connectives (see False (logic) § False, negation and contradiction for more). Neither conjunction, disjunction, nor material conditional has an equivalent form constructed from the other four logical connectives.

  8. Truth table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table

    A truth table is a mathematical table used in logic—specifically in connection with Boolean algebra, Boolean functions, and propositional calculus—which sets out the functional values of logical expressions on each of their functional arguments, that is, for each combination of values taken by their logical variables. [1]

  9. Randolph diagram - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randolph_diagram

    The R-diagrams for p and q are shown below, respectively: For more than two statements, the four spaces formed by the intersection of lines p and q must be subdivided into more lines. In the case of r, a single upward sloping line (/) is added in each of the four spaces. The R-diagram for r is shown below: