Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Court, using what is called the "effective control test", examines the role of the government in the institution. A government actor consists of institutions for which the government has statutory authority to exercise substantial control over the day-to-day operations, policy-making, and as well provides substantial funding for the ...
However, the Government of Ontario chose to appeal Belobaba's ruling, and on September 19, the Court of Appeal for Ontario granted a stay of proceedings pending the resolution of the appeal. [13] [c 9] Since the stay ruling was successful, the Ontario government did not need to utilize the notwithstanding clause. [16]
Infringements are upheld if the government's objective in infringing the right is "pressing and substantial" in a "free and democratic society", and if the infringement can be "demonstrably justified". [3] The Supreme Court of Canada has applied the Oakes test to uphold laws against hate speech (e.g., in R v Keegstra) and obscenity (e.g., in R ...
In U.S. constitutional law, when a law infringes upon a fundamental constitutional right, the court may apply the strict scrutiny standard. Strict scrutiny holds the challenged law as presumptively invalid unless the government can demonstrate that the law or regulation is necessary to achieve a "compelling state interest". The government must ...
The primary test to determine if the purpose is demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society is known as the Oakes test, which takes its name from the essential case R v Oakes [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 which was written by Chief Justice Dickson. The test is applied once the claimant has proven that one of the provisions of the Charter ...
Canada (House of Commons) v Vaid, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667, 2005 SCC 30 is the leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on parliamentary privilege.The court developed a test for determining when a claim of parliamentary privilege can protect a legislative body or its members from legal scrutiny.
Canadian constitutional law (French: droit constitutionnel du Canada) is the area of Canadian law relating to the interpretation and application of the Constitution of Canada by the courts. All laws of Canada , both provincial and federal, must conform to the Constitution and any laws inconsistent with the Constitution have no force or effect.
According to Crevier v Quebec (AG), section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides the superior courts of the provinces with "inherent constitutionally protected jurisdiction to decide the vires and constitutionality of any enactment, whether federal or provincial, unless that jurisdiction is explicitly taken away within the constitutional ...