When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. South Carolina v. Baker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Baker

    South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that section 310(b)(1) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) does not violate the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  3. John Deere Model B - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Deere_Model_B

    The John Deere Model B tractor was a two-plow row-crop tractor produced by John Deere from 1935 to 1952, with direct successors produced until 1960. The B was a scaled-down, less expensive version of the John Deere Model A. It was followed by the updated 50, 520 and 530 models.

  4. Graham v. John Deere Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_v._John_Deere_Co.

    Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified the nonobviousness requirement in United States patent law, [1] set forth 14 years earlier in Patent Act of 1952 and codified as 35 U.S.C. § 103. [2]

  5. John Deere - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Deere

    Deere & Company, doing business as John Deere (/ ˈ dʒ ɒ n ˈ d ɪər /), is an American corporation that manufactures agricultural machinery, heavy equipment, forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment and lawn care equipment.

  6. Flores-Figueroa v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flores-Figueroa_v._United...

    Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. [1]

  7. Lockyer v. Andrade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockyer_v._Andrade

    Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.

  8. Patent infringement under United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement_under...

    Under 35 U.S.C. § 284, a patent owner is entitled to "damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty." [8] Lost profits that result from infringement of their patent are also compensable. Reasonableness is determined by the standard practices of the particular industry most relevant to the ...

  9. R v Hinks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Hinks

    In 1996 Miss Hinks was friendly with a 53-year-old man, John Dolphin, who was of limited intelligence. She was his main carer. During 1996 Mr Dolphin withdrew around £60,000 from his building society account, which was deposited in Miss Hinks's account. In 1997 Hinks was charged with theft.