Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) [1] is a fallacy of irrelevance in which arguments or information are dismissed or validated based solely on their source of origin rather than their content. In other words, a claim is ignored or given credibility based on its source rather than the claim itself.
First World problems are a subset of this fallacy. [102] [103] Genetic fallacy – a conclusion is suggested based solely on something or someone's origin rather than its current meaning or context. [104] I'm entitled to my opinion – a person discredits any opposition by claiming that they are entitled to their opinion.
Fallacies involving the irrelevant appraisal of something based on its origin. Pages in category "Genetic fallacies" The following 24 pages are in this category, out of 24 total.
Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science starts with a brief survey of the spread of the ideas of "cranks" and "pseudo-scientists", attacking the credulity of the popular press and the irresponsibility of publishing houses in helping to propagate these ideas. Cranks often cite historical cases where ideas were rejected which are now accepted ...
Rather, these traits depend on a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. [31] Not all cats are attracted and intoxicated by catnip, which only affects about two thirds of them. Alternatives exist, such as valerian root and leaves. [32] [33] Lemmings do not engage in mass suicidal dives off cliffs when migrating.
However, skeptics banding together in societies that research the paranormal and fringe science is a modern phenomenon. [62] Two early important works influential to the skeptical movement were Daniel Webster Hering's Foibles and Fallacies of Science (1924) and D. H. Rawcliffe's The Psychology of the Occult. [62]
Research programmes can be degenerative or progressive and only degenerative research programmes must be abandoned at some point. For Lakatos, this is mostly corroborated by facts in history. In contradistinction, Popper did not propose his methodology as a tool to reconstruct the history of science.
Biological determinism, also known as genetic determinism, [1] is the belief that human behaviour is directly controlled by an individual's genes or some component of their physiology, generally at the expense of the role of the environment, whether in embryonic development or in learning. [2]