When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: trial questions for expert witness in california

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Diaz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaz_v._United_States

    In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime charged or of a defense. Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [3] Over this objection, the District Court ruled that it would permit such testimony.

  3. Daubert standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard

    Although the Daubert standard is now the law in federal court and over half of the states, the Frye standard remains the law in some jurisdictions including California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [7] Florida passed a bill to adopt the Daubert standard as the law governing expert witness testimony, which took effect on July 1, 2013. [8]

  4. Ultimate issue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_issue

    If the issue is the defendant's mental state at the time of the offense, the ultimate issue would be the defendant's sanity or insanity during the commission of the crime. . In the past, expert witnesses were allowed to give testimony on ultimate issues, such as the applicability of the insanity defense to a particular defenda

  5. Foundation (evidence) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_(evidence)

    Attorneys must lay a foundation for witness testimony at trial. [26] The process differs when the witness is a lay witness or an expert witness. [26] However, as a baseline matter for both expert and lay witnesses, the testimony must be established to be helpful in assisting the trier of fact understand a fact at issue in the case. [27] [28]

  6. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    the witness testifies at the present trial; and; the witness is subject to cross-examination about the prior statement. [4] There is no requirement that the prior consistent statement have been made under oath at a prior trial or hearing. A form of prior consistent statement excepted from this rule is that of prior identification by the witness ...

  7. Park Dietz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Dietz

    Park Elliot Dietz (born August 13, 1948) is a forensic psychiatrist who has consulted or testified in many of the highest-profile US criminal cases, including those of spousal killer Betty Broderick, mass murderer Jared Lee Loughner, and serial killers Joel Rifkin, Arthur Shawcross, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Kaczynski, Richard Kuklinski, the D.C. sniper attacks, and William Bonin.

  8. 9th Circuit fully blocks California social media age ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/9th-circuit-fully-blocks...

    (The Center Square) – The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked a controversial California law that would have eventually required social media users in the state to verify their ages to ...

  9. Redirect examination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redirect_examination

    For example, the opponent might elicit on cross-examination an admission that the witness did not directly perceive every single part of the events at issue; the proponent will attempt on redirect to establish that the witness perceived enough of those events that the finder of fact can draw reasonable inferences as to the gaps where the ...

  1. Ad

    related to: trial questions for expert witness in california