When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Omnipotence paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox

    Wittgenstein also mentions the will, life after death, and God—arguing that, "When the answer cannot be put into words, neither can the question be put into words". [20] Wittgenstein's work expresses the omnipotence paradox as a problem in semantics—the study of how we give symbols meaning. (The retort "That's only semantics," is a way of ...

  3. List of paradoxes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paradoxes

    However, some of these paradoxes qualify to fit into the mainstream viewpoint of a paradox, which is a self-contradictory result gained even while properly applying accepted ways of reasoning. These paradoxes, often called antinomy, point out genuine problems in our understanding of the ideas of truth and description.

  4. Argument from free will - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_free_will

    Ancient and medieval; Anselm of Canterbury; Augustine of Hippo; Avicenna; Averroes; Boethius; Gaudapada; Al-Ghazali; Gaunilo of Marmoutiers; Pico della Mirandola; Heraclitus; King James VI and I

  5. Epimenides paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epimenides_paradox

    All of the works of Epimenides are now lost, and known only through quotations by other authors. The quotation from the Cretica of Epimenides is given by R.N. Longenecker, "Acts of the Apostles", in volume 9 of The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Frank E. Gaebelein, editor

  6. Theodicy and the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy_and_the_Bible

    Archaeology and Bible History. [60] The Bible assumes that all human beings have "free will" in the sense of "the ability to make meaningful choices," that is, "the ability to have voluntary choices that have real effects." If God Is Good. [61] We make willing choices, choices that have real effect .... In this sense, it is certainly consistent ...

  7. Epicurean paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurean_paradox

    Epicurus was not an atheist, although he rejected the idea of a god concerned with human affairs; followers of Epicureanism denied the idea that there was no god. While the conception of a supreme, happy and blessed god was the most popular during his time, Epicurus rejected such a notion, as he considered it too heavy a burden for a god to have to worry about all the problems in the world.

  8. Problem of Hell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_Hell

    In terms of the Bible itself, issues of salvation and access to heaven or to hell are mentioned frequently. [ opinion ] [ discuss ] Examples include John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

  9. Internal consistency of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_consistency_of...

    An American Christian family's Bible dating to 1859. Disputes regarding the internal consistency and textual integrity of the Bible have a long history.. Classic texts that discuss questions of inconsistency from a critical secular perspective include the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Baruch Spinoza, the Dictionnaire philosophique of Voltaire, the Encyclopédie of Denis Diderot and The Age ...