Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), as of 2000, Iran ranks 58 in healthcare and 93 in health-system performance. [9] In 2016, Bloomberg News ranked Iran 30th most efficient healthcare system ahead of the United States and Brazil. [10] The report shows life expectancy in Iran is 75.5 years and per capita spending on healthcare is $346.
Map of total public and private health expenditure per person (see year above map). [1] This article includes 2 lists of countries of the world and their total expenditure on health per capita. Total expenditure includes both public and private expenditures. See also: Health spending as percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by country.
United Nations/Complete report for Iran: Ranking is from highest rate to lowest; Malaria cases in Iran: 27/100,000 of population 2001 World ranking of overall national health systems: 93 190 WHO: Ranked from best overall health care systems to worst; More info: Health literacy: 2000 World ranking of national health system performance ...
According to Iran's parliamentary committee on health and treatment in 2015, 12 million Iranians suffer from mental illnesses (mostly stemming from economic reasons). [55] According to the ministry of health, mental issues among women is a major problem and it is the second cause of death and disabilities among men.
This is a list of countries by quality of healthcare as published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . [ 1 ] The list includes 7 types of cancer along with strokes and heart attacks.
Iran: 90%: Public insurance ... Mali's health and development indicators rank among the worst in the world. In 2000 only 62–65 percent of the population was ...
The indicators are used to create a health index, an education index and an income index, each with a value between 0 and 1. The geometric mean of the three indices—that is, the cube root of the product of the indices—is the human development index. A value above 0.800 is classified as very high, between 0.700 and 0.799 as high, 0.550 to 0. ...
The WHO rankings are claimed to have been subject to many and varied criticisms since its publication. [citation needed] Concerns raised over the five factors considered, data sets used and comparison methodologies have led health bodies and political commentators in most of the countries on the list to question the efficacy of its results and validity of any conclusions drawn.