When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Precedent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent

    Precedent is a judicial decision that serves as an authority for courts when deciding subsequent identical or similar cases. [1] [2] [3] Fundamental to common law legal systems, precedent operates under the principle of stare decisis ("to stand by things decided"), where past judicial decisions serve as case law to guide future rulings, thus promoting consistency and predictability.

  3. Dissenting opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissenting_opinion

    A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law, though they can sometimes be cited as a form of persuasive authority in subsequent cases when arguing that the court's holding should be limited or overturned. In some cases, a previous dissent is used to spur a change in the law, and a later case may ...

  4. Concurring opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurring_opinion

    Having failed to receive a majority of the court's votes, concurring opinions are not binding precedent and cannot be cited as such. But concurring opinions can sometimes be cited as a form of persuasive precedent (assuming the point of law is one on which there is no binding precedent already in effect). The conflict in views between a ...

  5. Judicial opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_opinion

    A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law. However, they are cited from time to time as a persuasive authority when arguing that the court's holding should be limited or overturned. In some cases, a previous dissent is used to spur a change in the law, and a later case will write a majority ...

  6. Obiter dictum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dictum

    Obiter dictum (usually used in the plural, obiter dicta) is a Latin phrase meaning "other things said", [1] that is, a remark in a legal opinion that is "said in passing" by any judge or arbitrator. It is a concept derived from English common law , whereby a judgment comprises only two elements: ratio decidendi and obiter dicta .

  7. Persuasive precedent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Persuasive_precedent&...

    Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Persuasive precedent

  8. Mechanisms of the English common law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanisms_of_the_English...

    Even if a court is bound to observe a precedent decision, it does not follow that the whole of the judgment is binding. One must distinguish between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta . Ratio decidendi is the "reason for the decision", and forms the crux of the cases; whereas obiter dicta is "other things that are said", i.e. matters said in ...

  9. Persuasive writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_writing

    Persuasive writing is a form of written arguments designed to convince, motivate, or sway readers toward a specific point of view or opinion on a given topic. This writing style relies on presenting reasoned opinions supported by evidence that substantiates the central thesis .