When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. YouTube copyright issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_issues

    In May 2016, a YouTube user Matt Hosseinzadeh sued the YouTube channel h3h3productions (run by Ethan and Hila Klein) citing a video that criticized his content. Fellow YouTube user Philip DeFranco started a GoFundMe fundraiser entitled "Help for H3H3". [36] The initiative raised over $130,000.

  3. Fair use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

    Fair use is a doctrine in United States law that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limitations to copyright intended to balance the interests of copyright holders with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works by ...

  4. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc...

    The entertainment company Viacom sued YouTube, the video-sharing site owned by Google, alleging that YouTube had engaged in "brazen" and "massive" copyright infringement by allowing users to upload and view hundreds of thousands of videos owned by Viacom without permission. [2]

  5. Viacom vs. YouTube/Google: A Piracy Case in Their Own Words - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-03-21-viacom-v-youtube...

    In early 2006, YouTube introduced an easy-to-use tool for copyright owners to send a take-down request, introduced "hashing" technology that blocked identical uploads of previously removed ...

  6. Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp.

    YouTube removed the video, and notified Lenz of the removal and the infringement accusation. Lenz in turn sent YouTube a counter-notification, claiming fair use and requesting that the video be reposted. Six weeks later, YouTube reposted the video.

  7. Legal issues with fan fiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_issues_with_fan_fiction

    OTW's position is that fan fiction and other fan labor products constitute copyright fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107 because they add "new meaning and messages to the original" work, [37] and thus fall under the exemption to U.S. copyright law the Supreme Court defined in Campbell [38] and which was later revisited and followed in Suntrust. [39]

  8. Copyright Act of 1976 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976

    Additionally, the fair use defense to copyright infringement was codified for the first time in section 107 of the 1976 Act. Fair use was not a novel proposition in 1976, however, as federal courts had been using a common law form of the doctrine since the 1840s (an English version of fair use appeared much earlier). The Act codified this ...

  9. YouTube copyright strike - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_strike

    YouTube's own practice is to issue a "YouTube copyright strike" on the user accused of copyright infringement. [1] When a YouTube user gets hit with a copyright strike, they are required to watch a warning video about the rules of copyright and take trivia questions about the danger of copyright. [2] A copyright strike will expire after 90 days.