Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
To decide whether two given regular expressions describe the same language, each can be converted into an equivalent minimal deterministic finite automaton via Thompson's construction, powerset construction, and DFA minimization. If, and only if, the resulting automata agree up to renaming of states, the regular expressions' languages agree.
the DFA with a minimum number of states for a particular regular language (Minimization Problem) DFAs are equivalent in computing power to nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs). This is because, firstly any DFA is also an NFA, so an NFA can do what a DFA can do.
Therefore, the length of the regular expression representing the language accepted by M is at most 1 / 3 (4 n+1 (6s+7)f - f - 3) symbols, where f denotes the number of final states. This exponential blowup is inevitable, because there exist families of DFAs for which any equivalent regular expression must be of exponential size.
An example of an accepting state appears in Fig. 5: a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) that detects whether the binary input string contains an even number of 0s. S 1 (which is also the start state) indicates the state at which an even number of 0s has been input. S 1 is therefore an accepting state. This acceptor will finish in an accept ...
For certain regular expression operators like | (the operator for alternation or logical disjunction) it is superior to PCRE. Unlike PCRE, which supports features such as lookarounds, backreferences and recursion , RE2 is only able to recognize regular languages due to its construction using the Thompson DFA [ 4 ] algorithm.
For example, a paper in 1999 described how JFLAP now allowed one to experiment with construction type proofs, such as converting an NFA to a DFA to a minimal state DFA, and as another example, converting NPDA to CFG and vice versa. [6] In 2002 JFLAP was converted to Swing. In 2005-2007 a study was run with fourteen institutions using JFLAP.
Regular languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 3) which can be matched by a state machine (more specifically, by a deterministic finite automaton or a nondeterministic finite automaton) constructed from a regular expression. In particular, a regular language can match constructs like "A follows B", "Either A or B ...
(1) If is regular, construct a minimal DFA to accept it. Clearly, if x , y {\displaystyle x,y} end up in the same state after running through the DFA, then x ∼ L y {\displaystyle x\sim _{L}y} , thus the number of equivalence classes of ∼ L {\displaystyle \sim _{L}} is at most the number of DFA states, which must be finite.