When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Random - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Random

    On Wikipedia and other sites running on MediaWiki, Special:Random can be used to access a random article in the main namespace; this feature is useful as a tool to generate a random article. Depending on your browser, it's also possible to load a random page using a keyboard shortcut (in Firefox , Edge , and Chrome Alt-Shift + X ).

  3. User:Smallbones/1000 random results - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../1000_random_results

    Disambiguation pages and lists were not included in the sample. Data was gathered on the date of the first edit and November 2015 page views. Before any data could be gathered one article was deleted at AfD and another was merged. Both these articles were discarded from the sample. See User:Smallbones/1000 random for the full sample.

  4. Randomized response - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_response

    For example, social scientists have used it to ask people whether they use drugs, whether they have illegally installed telephones, or whether they have evaded paying taxes. Before abortions were legal, social scientists used the method to ask women whether they had had abortions .

  5. File:Example.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Example.pdf

    Short title: example derived form Ghostscript examples: Image title: derivative of Ghostscript examples "text_graphic_image.pdf", "alphabet.ps" and "waterfal.ps"

  6. Wikipedia:Unusual articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Unusual_articles

    Each entry on this list should be an article on its own (not merely a section in a less unusual article) and of decent quality, and in large meeting Wikipedia's manual of style. For unusual contributions that are of greater levity, see Wikipedia:Silly Things. In this list, a star indicates a featured article. A plus indicates a good article.

  7. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    If the answers to these questions are the same, then the work is self-published. If they are different, then the work is not self-published. The opposite of self-publishing is traditional publishing, such as HarperCollins publishing textbooks, Condé Nast publishing fashion magazines, Comcast publishing television news shows, or Elsevier ...

  8. Template:Cite interview - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_interview

    CS1 template for Interviews Template parameters [Edit template data] This template has custom formatting. Parameter Description Type Status Last name last last1 author Last name of the first interviewee String suggested First name first first1 First name of the first interviewee String suggested Subject link subject-link Wikipedia link to Subject (Interviewee) Page name optional Interviewer ...

  9. Wikipedia talk:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable...

    IMDB for anything more than basic info, as, like wikis, it is user-created and edited (see also Wikipedia:IMDb for examples on where it is appropriate); Personal web sites and blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace), and discussion forums; Usenet and IRC postings;