When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. McGautha v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGautha_v._California

    McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971), is a criminal case heard by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court held that the lack of legal standards by which juries imposed the death penalty was not an unconstitutional violation of the due process clause portions of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  3. List of most recent executions by jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_recent...

    Capital punishment is retained in law by 55 UN member states or observer states, with 140 having abolished it in law or in practice.The most recent legal executions performed by nations and other entities with criminal law jurisdiction over the people present within its boundaries are listed below.

  4. Capital punishment in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the...

    If the state has no death penalty, the judge must choose a state with the death penalty for carrying out the execution. The federal government has a facility (at U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute ) and regulations only for executions by lethal injection, but the United States Code allows U.S. Marshals to use state facilities and employees for ...

  5. The US has executed 23 men this year. A look at the state of ...

    www.aol.com/news/death-penalty-us-states-still...

    The United States has executed 23 men this year, with six of those executions coming during one remarkable 11-day period. At least two more executions are scheduled before the end of the year.

  6. Oklahoma and its affinity for the death penalty - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-affinity-death-penalty...

    State capital cases, or death penalty proceedings, cost state taxpayers 3.2 times more than noncapital cases on average, according to the 2017 study of the Oklahoma death penalty. More revealing ...

  7. Hurst v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurst_v._Florida

    Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona [1] to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.

  8. Missouri has a history of death penalty injustice. Stop ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/missouri-history-death-penalty...

    The state attorney general’s office is so zealous that it told the state Supreme Court one wrongly convicted man should be put to death even despite evidence that he’s innocent. Missouri has a ...

  9. Kansas v. Marsh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_v._Marsh

    Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Kansas death penalty statute was consistent with the United States Constitution. The statute in question provided for a death sentence when the aggravating factors and mitigating factors were of equal weight. [1]