Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A method analogous to piece-wise linear approximation but using only arithmetic instead of algebraic equations, uses the multiplication tables in reverse: the square root of a number between 1 and 100 is between 1 and 10, so if we know 25 is a perfect square (5 × 5), and 36 is a perfect square (6 × 6), then the square root of a number greater than or equal to 25 but less than 36, begins with ...
The square root of a positive integer is the product of the roots of its prime factors, because the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. Since p 2 k = p k , {\textstyle {\sqrt {p^{2k}}}=p^{k},} only roots of those primes having an odd power in the factorization are necessary.
A number where some but not all prime factors have multiplicity above 1 is neither square-free nor squareful. The Liouville function λ(n) is 1 if Ω(n) is even, and is -1 if Ω(n) is odd. The Möbius function μ(n) is 0 if n is not square-free. Otherwise μ(n) is 1 if Ω(n) is even, and is −1 if Ω(n) is odd.
144 (one hundred [and] forty-four) is the natural number following 143 and preceding 145. It is coincidentally both the square of twelve (a dozen dozens , or one gross .) and the twelfth Fibonacci number , and the only nontrivial number in the sequence that is square.
Fermat's method works best when there is a factor near the square-root of N. If the approximate ratio of two factors ( d / c {\displaystyle d/c} ) is known, then a rational number v / u {\displaystyle v/u} can be picked near that value.
Tonelli–Shanks cannot be used for composite moduli: finding square roots modulo composite numbers is a computational problem equivalent to integer factorization. [ 1 ] An equivalent, but slightly more redundant version of this algorithm was developed by Alberto Tonelli [ 2 ] [ 3 ] in 1891.
In the case of two nested square roots, the following theorem completely solves the problem of denesting. [2]If a and c are rational numbers and c is not the square of a rational number, there are two rational numbers x and y such that + = if and only if is the square of a rational number d.
We are not taking the square root of any negative values here, since both and are necessarily positive. But we have lost the solution x = − 2. {\displaystyle x=-2.} The reason is that x {\displaystyle x} is actually not in general the positive square root of x 2 . {\displaystyle x^{2}.}