Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The difference between de dicto and de re beliefs or the corresponding ascriptions concerns the contributions singular terms like names and other referential devices make to the semantic properties of the belief or its ascription. [4] [35] In regular contexts, the truth-value of a sentence does not change upon substitution of co-referring terms ...
Secular faith refers to a belief or conviction that is not based on religious or supernatural doctrines. [83] Secular faith can arise from a wide range of sources and can take many forms, depending on the individual's beliefs and experiences, including: Philosophy Many secular beliefs are rooted in philosophical ideas, such as humanism or ...
A conviction is an unshakable belief in something without needing proof or evidence. Moral conviction, therefore, refers to a strong and absolute belief or attitude that something is right or wrong, moral or immoral. Moral convictions have a strong motivational force.Moral motivation
In contrast to faith meaning blind trust, in the absence of evidence, even in the teeth of evidence, Alister McGrath quotes Oxford Anglican theologian W. H. Griffith-Thomas (1861–1924), who states faith is "not blind, but intelligent" and "commences with the conviction of the mind based on adequate evidence", which McGrath sees as "a good and ...
[8] [7] [6] Some see this difference in the strength of the agent's conviction by holding that belief is a weak affirmation while knowledge entails a strong conviction. [4] However, the more common approach to such expressions is to understand them not literally but through paraphrases, for example, as "I do not merely believe that; I know it."
In law, a conviction is the determination by a court of law that a defendant is guilty of a crime. [1] A conviction may follow a guilty plea that is accepted by the court, a jury trial in which a verdict of guilty is delivered, or a trial by judge in which the defendant is found guilty. The opposite of a conviction is an acquittal (that
That is, the motivational internalist believes that there is an internal, necessary connection between one's conviction that X ought to be done and one's motivation to do X. Conversely, the motivational externalist (or moral externalist) claims that there is no necessary internal connection between moral convictions and moral motives. [2]
Since its original presentation, belief congruence theory has also generated a large number of vigorous critiques, testing the theory's hypothesis is challenging because membership in social or ethnic groups often overlaps with similarities within groups and differences between them in many key areas, including beliefs. [8]