When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1] The decision articulated a doctrine known as "Chevron deference". [2]

  3. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v...

    The District Court, applying Chevron, granted summary judgment in favor of NMFS. Despite Chevron providing deference in the case of an ambiguously worded statute, the District Court found that the MSA unambiguously provides for industry-funded monitoring of the herring fishery, and thus concluded its analysis at the first step of Chevron. The ...

  4. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The court's 6-3 ruling on Friday overturned a 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron that has instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress are not crystal ...

  5. Supreme Court's overturning of 40-year Chevron ruling is a ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-courts-overturning-40...

    Friday ’ s ruling that overturned an important 1984 ruling called Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council was a belated victory for Trump’s deregulatory agenda, with all three of his ...

  6. The Supreme Court Didn't Destroy the Regulatory State. It ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-didnt-destroy...

    For a more rational view of what the Supreme Court is doing here, look to the majority opinion that overturned Chevron. In it, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the legal doctrine requiring ...

  7. Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingle_v._Chevron_U.S.A._Inc.

    Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005), [2] was a landmark case in United States regulatory takings law whereby the Court expressly overruled precedent created in Agins v. City of Tiburon . [ 1 ] Agins held that a government regulation of private property effects a taking if such regulation does not substantially advance legitimate state ...

  8. Why a recent Supreme Court decision could undermine the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-recent-supreme-court-decision...

    "Overturning Chevron was great (from a Republican perspective) when Democrats are in power, but it also makes deregulation more difficult, which is why the original Chevron case went to the ...

  9. United States v. Mead Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Mead_Corp.

    United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the issue of when Chevron deference should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that Chevron deference applies when Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force ...