When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: court accepted dna testing

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DNA paternity testing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing

    If a parentage test does not meet forensic standards for the state in question, a court-ordered test may be required for the results of the test to be admissible for legal purposes. For unmarried parents, if a parent is currently receiving child support or custody, but DNA testing later proves that the man is not the father, support ...

  3. Judge grants new DNA testing on 1 item in Scott Peterson case

    www.aol.com/news/judge-grants-dna-testing-only...

    A California judge ruled Wednesday that only one item from a list of evidence collected in the case of Scott Peterson, the man convicted 20 years ago of killing his pregnant wife, Laci, should ...

  4. DNA testing of clothing could further delay Anthony Patterson ...

    www.aol.com/dna-testing-clothing-could-further...

    In November 2023, Patterson was required to submit to DNA testing, according to court records. The sample was sent to a Texas Department of Public Safety lab in Lubbock for comparison to the clothes.

  5. Texas death row inmate's DNA testing case goes to US ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/texas-death-row-inmates-dna...

    The death row inmate, Ruben Gutierrez, appealed a lower court's ruling against his challenge to a Texas law limiting the use of DNA testing after a person has been convicted of a crime.

  6. Hank Skinner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hank_Skinner

    Despite pending litigation, Skinner was given an execution date for November 9, 2011. Gray County District Attorney Lynn Switzer (the respondent in Skinner's lawsuit) had written, in a brief to the court filed on June 2, 2011, that "Texas satisfied all the requirements of constitutional due process when it offered Skinner the opportunity to test the DNA evidence at trial."

  7. Maryland v. King - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_v._King

    Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court which held that a cheek swab of an arrestee's DNA is comparable to fingerprinting and therefore, a legal police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

  1. Ads

    related to: court accepted dna testing