When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. You are either with us, or against us - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or...

    In political communication, the phrase "you are either with us, or against us" and similar variations are used to generate polarisation and reject non-partisanship. [ citation needed ] The implied consequence of not joining the partisan effort of the speaker is to be deemed an enemy.

  3. False dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

    A false dilemma is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. [1] [2] [3] In its most simple form, called the fallacy of bifurcation, all but two alternatives are excluded. A fallacy is an argument, i.e. a series of premises together with a conclusion, that is unsound, i.e. not

  4. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Naturalistic fallacy fallacy is a type of argument from fallacy. Straw man fallacy – refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [110] Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data. [111]

  5. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Sometimes a speaker or writer uses a fallacy intentionally. In any context, including academic debate, a conversation among friends, political discourse, advertising, or comedic purposes, the arguer may use fallacious reasoning to try to persuade the listener or reader, by means other than offering relevant evidence, that the conclusion is true.

  6. Politician's syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician's_syllogism

    The politician's syllogism similarly says nothing about all known "somethings" that could be done. As is common with fallacious undistributed middle arguments, it can also be seen as the fallacy of affirming the consequent when restated as an equivalent hypothetical syllogism: [5] To improve things, things must change. We are changing things.

  7. Why Hur’s testimony isn’t leaving either party happy: From ...

    www.aol.com/news/why-hur-testimony-isn-t...

    Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team’s latest reporting and analysis from the campaign trail, the White House ...

  8. What is a Conservative? Understanding how the term works in ...

    www.aol.com/conservative-understanding-term...

    Like a lot of political vocabulary—see also: "left" and "right"—the political meaning of "conservative" came as a result of the French Revolution of 1789, when democratic radicals deposed the ...

  9. Appeal to fear - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_fear

    This fallacy has the following argument form: Either P or Q is true. Q is frightening. Therefore, P is true. The argument is invalid. The appeal to emotion is used in exploiting existing fears to create support for the speaker's proposal, namely P. Also, often the false dilemma fallacy is involved, suggesting Q is the proposed idea's sole ...