Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Formula Value Absolute risk increase ARI EER − CER: 0.1, or 10% Number needed to harm: NNH 1 / (EER − CER) 10 Relative risk (risk ratio) RR EER / CER: 1.25 Relative risk increase RRI (EER − CER) / CER, or RR − 1 0.25, or 25% Attributable fraction among the exposed: AF e (EER − CER) / EER: 0.2 Odds ratio: OR (EE / EN) / (CE / CN) 1.5
Formula Value Absolute risk reduction : ARR CER − EER: 0.3, or 30% Number needed to treat: NNT 1 / (CER − EER) 3.33 Relative risk (risk ratio) RR EER / CER: 0.25 Relative risk reduction: RRR (CER − EER) / CER, or 1 − RR: 0.75, or 75% Preventable fraction among the unexposed: PFu (CER − EER) / CER: 0.75 Odds ratio: OR (EE / EN) / (CE ...
An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates that the condition or event is more likely to occur in the first group. And an odds ratio less than 1 indicates that the condition or event is less likely to occur in the first group. The odds ratio must be nonnegative if it is defined. It is undefined if p 2 q 1 equals zero, i.e., if p 2 equals zero or q ...
Frequently used measures of risk and benefit identified by Jerkel, Katz and Elmore, [4] describe measures of risk difference (attributable risk), rate difference (often expressed as the odds ratio or relative risk), population attributable risk (PAR), and the relative risk reduction, which can be recalculated into a measure of absolute benefit ...
In fact, it can be shown that the unconditional analysis of matched pair data results in an estimate of the odds ratio which is the square of the correct, conditional one. [ 2 ] In addition to tests based on logistic regression, several other tests existed before conditional logistic regression for matched data as shown in related tests .
and = / / = While the prevalence is only 9% (9/100), the odds ratio (OR) is equal to 11.3 and the relative risk (RR) is equal to 7.2. Despite fulfilling the rare disease assumption overall, the OR and RR can hardly be considered to be approximately the same. However, the prevalence in the exposed group is 40%, which means is not sufficiently small
In practice the odds ratio is commonly used for case-control studies, as the relative risk cannot be estimated. [1] In fact, the odds ratio has much more common use in statistics, since logistic regression, often associated with clinical trials, works with the log of the odds ratio, not relative risk. Because the (natural log of the) odds of a ...
The adverse outcome (black) risk difference between the group exposed to the treatment (left) and the group unexposed to the treatment (right) is −0.25 (RD = −0.25, ARR = 0.25).