Ad
related to: yes we can new hampshire speech license status search by state listpublicrecords.info has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
will.i.am performs "Yes We Can" during the final day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado.. Since the original posting on YouTube, the video has been re-posted a number of times by other users and as of February 23, 2008, the video had been watched a combined total of more than 22 million times among all of the postings. [5]
A 1975 state supreme court case, Commonwealth v. Olivo , underscored official status of English; [ 8 ] in 2002, English was declared the "common public language." [ 9 ]
Proposed state or autonomous area: Republic of Texas. Ethnic group: Americans, Tejanos; Advocacy groups: Texas Nationalist Movement, [114] [115] Republic of Texas (group) New Hampshire [116] [117] Proposed state or autonomous area: New Hampshire Advocacy groups: NHexit, [118] [119] Foundation for New Hampshire Independence, [120] Free State ...
Speaker Term Party Residence Notes Richard Waldron Jr. 1684–1692 Portsmouth [1]Richard Martin 1692 Portsmouth [1]John Gilman 1692–1693 Exeter [1]John Pickering
Former President Donald Trump made several false claims in a speech Tuesday night after CNN and other media outlets projected that he would win the Republican presidential primary in New Hampshire.
The following is a list of New Hampshire state agencies—government agencies of the U.S. state of New Hampshire.Entries are listed alphabetically per their first distinguishing word (e.g. the New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets, and Food is listed under "A" for Agriculture), with subordinate agencies listed under their parent agency.
Apr. 9—CONCORD — The chief author of bipartisan legislation (HB 1305) to adopt a freedom of speech policy on public higher education campuses urged a state Senate panel to reject any further ...
Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, although the government cannot regulate the contents of speech, it can place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech for the public safety. [1]