Ad
related to: yes we can new hampshire speech license status search by state namepublicrecords.info has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
will.i.am performs "Yes We Can" during the final day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado.. Since the original posting on YouTube, the video has been re-posted a number of times by other users and as of February 23, 2008, the video had been watched a combined total of more than 22 million times among all of the postings. [5]
"Yes, we can!" was the theme of Senator Obama's speech following his second-place finish in the 2008 New Hampshire primary. [9] The phrase was also used in the song "Yes We Can", which was performed by numerous celebrities in support of Obama. [10] (Huerta endorsed Hillary Clinton in her campaign for the Democratic nomination for presidency in ...
A 1975 state supreme court case, Commonwealth v. Olivo , underscored official status of English; [ 8 ] in 2002, English was declared the "common public language." [ 9 ]
Speaker Term Party Residence Notes Richard Waldron Jr. 1684–1692 Portsmouth [1]Richard Martin 1692 Portsmouth [1]John Gilman 1692–1693 Exeter [1]John Pickering
How to register to vote in New Hampshire. To be eligible to register to vote in New Hampshire, you must meet the following three criteria: be a U.S. citizen, live in the state and turn 18 by the ...
Apr. 9—CONCORD — The chief author of bipartisan legislation (HB 1305) to adopt a freedom of speech policy on public higher education campuses urged a state Senate panel to reject any further ...
"Live Free or Die" is the official motto of the U.S. state of New Hampshire, adopted by the state in 1945. [1] It is possibly the best-known of all state mottos , partly because it conveys an assertive independence historically found in American political philosophy and partly because of its contrast to the milder sentiments found in other ...
Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, although the government cannot regulate the contents of speech, it can place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech for the public safety. [1]